Ivermectin 01 : Another Sponsored Study With a Design That Will Fail.
If Successful Off Patented Drugs or Treatments are Discredited it paves the way for Expensive Patented Drugs; Who would do such a thing ?
To understand more about the background of this growing investigation of “Designed to Fail” studies see: http://tribeqr.com/v/gatessubstack
The Study:
Effect of Ivermectin vs Placebo on Time to Sustained Recovery in Outpatients With Mild to Moderate COVID-19. A Randomized Clinical Trial
Published October 21 ,
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36269852/
In http://tribeqr.com/v/gatessubstack the key traits for looking at any study to see if it is designed to fail
a) Look at the Authors and look for the Author Affiliations with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF)
Review Authors and Contributors to see affiliations
The Excel File will help
Here is a template form from the New England Journal of Medicine that Authors of this paper must fill out in disclosing conflicts of interests:
Excerpt:
Ticks this box and exposes what might be called a Vipers Nest:
The following affiliates who have received Grants from BMGF were identified.
Grants Identified so far to these affiliates:
Duke University $327,737,456.00 - Lead Author(s)
University of Minnesota $30,106,045.00
Vanderbilt University $21,772,416.00
Cornell University parent University of Weill Cornell Medicine $252,673,940.00
Johns Hopkins University $1,000,711,384.00
University of Pittsburgh $62,084,198.00
University of Colorado $36,651,234.00
University of Florida $22,411,438.00
b) Look at the Method; There you will invariably see one or more obvious design flaws from i),ii),iii) and iv) Identified and tested below:
i) Not done in the early stages (eg after Viral replication has taken place)
Ticks this box; See the study : Results
By the time this study was done it was common knowledge that Ivermectin, when used in the prevention and or treatment of Covid19 is used as part of multi-drug Protocols and is MOST effective when treated in the first 5 days of the disease.
See: https://aapsonline.org/covidpatientguide/ available for well over a year
This is the stage when Covid19 is in the viral replication phase
In a trial designed to fail for Ivermectin it would insure Ivermectin was not given in the first 5 days. In this trial the mean time between giving the limited 3 days course in this study was SIX (6) days
ii) Wrong and/or known dangerous dosages
Ticks this Box See the Study : Introduction
"ivermectin (400 μg/kg daily for 3 days)"
By the time this study was done it was common knowledge that Ivermectin, when used in the prevention and or treatment of Covid19 is used as part of multi-drug Protocols and is MOST effective when used for 5 to 30 days of the disease.
See: https://aapsonline.org/covidpatientguide/
In a trial designed to fail for Ivermectin it would insure Ivermectin was not given for a long enough period
iii) In the absence of known critical partner Drugs - in the case of HCQ and Ivermectin without Zinc
By the time this study was done it was common knowledge that Ivermectin, when used in the prevention and or treatment of Covid19 is used as part of multi-drug Protocols that includes Zinc
It has been known for years now that Ivermectin is a Zinc Ionophore and that this property alone can account for the results being seen around the globe in clinics using BOTH Zinc and Ivermectin in their Covid-19 treatment Protocols.
See: https://aapsonline.org/covidpatientguide/
The paper below from way back in 2010 showed this path was (or should have been) common knowledge. You and no doubt the Authors of this “study” can and could have seen it in the October 2010 Paper!!
It is worth repeating: at the time of this study it was academic and medical common knowledge that Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine were being used as Zinc Ionophores in LIFE SAVING Covid-19 treatments. and this study omitted Zinc!
See: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21079686/
You can also directly download the peer reviewed October 2010 paper below (just in case); some of the “respected” medical journals are now removing both submitted and peer reviewed papers that their sponsors may not like published.
Download
This “study” clearly Ticks this “Failure Design” Box
In a trial designed to fail for Ivermectin it would insure Ivermectin was not given with partner drug Zinc.
iv) Done on a population group where you can expect "no statistical difference" result
Where the majority ,or the entirety, of the study groups comprise young participants without co-morbidities (ie low risk stratified participants) a good outcome regardless of what was tested will be observed regardless of the use of Ivermectin or a Placebo.
Ticks this Box See the Study : Methods Sub Section Interventions
No Mention of any patients with Co-Morbidities and there was a table in the graphs that uncovers that 75% of the participants were under 56
(IQR) Means the middle 50% of participants in that age range (Namely 36-56)
So a further 25% of the study group are under 39 Years of Age
The chances of Hospitalization because of Covid19 are very low
By the time this study was done it was common knowledge that the hospitalization and death with Covid19 was highly age stratified.
From the CDC Website
In a trial designed to fail for Ivermectin it would insure Ivermectin was not given to a large group of most at risk candidates to minimize the possible observable differences from the intervention.
In this trial had they limited the age of participants to 65 and above they would have seen a resolution of outcomes 100 times or greater than was possible with the the age group criteria of this study.
To read up more on the “The War On Ivermectin” :
Direct link https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/151077386X
Share link you can text : http://tribeqr.com/v/gatesivermectin01
Another Study Designed to fail see: http://tribeqr.com/v/gatesivermectin02
For yet Another Study Designed to fail see: http://tribeqr.com/v/gatesivermectin03
Twitter Share Link https://twitter.com/tniwef/status/1680333767880347648
Disclaimer: All content is presented for educational and/or entertainment purposes only. Under no circumstances should it be mistaken for professional advice, nor is it at all intended to be taken as such. The contents simply reflect current newsworthy items on Covid that are freely available. It is subject to error and change without notice. The presence of a link to a website does not indicate approval or endorsement of that web site or any services, products, or opinions that may be offered by them.
Neither this Substack nor any of its principals or contributors are under any obligation to update or keep current the information contained herein.
Although the information contained is derived from sources which are believed to be reliable, they cannot be guaranteed.
Disclosure: We accept no advertising or compensation, and have no material connection to any products, brands, topics or companies mentioned anywhere on this post.
Fair Use Notice: This post may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This post is making such material available in efforts to advance understanding of issues of social significance. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.